Minority government in Tasmania: Crucial changes essential to benefit from power sharing opportunities after March 20 election.

Report reveals limitations of current political system and solutions to attain healthy democratic change for Tasmania’s future.

Minority government, the likely outcome of the election on 20th March 2010, should not be seen as a threat but a positive and dynamic way of power sharing with cooperative dialogue.

Power Sharing Government 2010 Report

Tasmanians for a Healthy Democracy have released their Power Sharing Government 2010 Report to Tasmanian politicians and candidates. This comprehensive report defines power sharing and identifies positive solutions for the Tasmanian political system. It outlines the benefits and limitations of minority government for Tasmania, citing past examples and those operating overseas. Topical issues ranging from Corporate Donations, the Tasmanian Integrity Body, Human Rights Act and the role of the judiciary through to Direct Democracy and Civic education for schools are also included in the report.

The formation of a Liberal Democrat party could provide progressive liberals with the tool they need to incorporate ideas for change, and an opportunity for the Democrats to re-engage in politics. This may facilitate a transition toward a more representative, progressive governance system.

Dominance by majority parties does not allow a representational democracy. With less than 5% of Australians as members of political parties establishing policies on which legislation is based, our political system does not represent the people.

Moving away from Darwin's survival of the fittest/most dominant paradigm into a more integrated approach that embraces diversity and empowers individuals, could be a great step forward for Australian politics and culture. Power sharing governance based on ethical decision making is crucial for this to eventuate. Collaboration and respect would provide many benefits to our democratic processes and therefore the people, giving potential for constructive and progressive development.

An Australian Constitution enshrining a Human Rights Act could be the answer to prevent our citizens from being left stranded, kidnapped or imprisoned overseas and to give all Australians their rightful protection. The trauma endured by the individual, family and friends during these experiences is immense. The mental and sometimes physical scarring that results will undoubtedly mark these individuals, their families and associates forever. Australian society is also under strain as a result, with strong compassion and empathy felt for those who are suffering.

Empowering communities to set up co-operatives could create the resilience needed to overcome many of the challenges of the 21st century. Farmers, forestry workers, factory workers and others have the opportunity to take control of their lives rather than be dictated to by the companies currently neglecting their needs and the Tasmanian economy.

With Australian and international support for brand Tasmania, money would stay in the state to strengthen our economy and encourage diversity of participation in a healthy economy. Employment of Tasmanians in businesses in which they have ownership will motivate them to excel. Quality of life would improve and the state could thrive.

Cooperatives that use ethical principles, respect and collaboration could create a win-win situation for all Tasmanians. It is heartening to hear some political parties are reviewing this strategy, as cooperatives could be part of the healthy democratic processes to enable Tasmania to make the changes needed to reach its full potential.